Katie and David were the best of friends. They shared many common interests and spent a lot of time with each other. Although Katie regarded their relationship as purely platonic, David developed romantic feelings for Katie after some time. This made Katie uncomfortable at first, but as David promised that this would not affect their friendship in any way, Katie agreed to put her concerns aside.
Things between Katie and David were great, until Katie also began spending time with another friend, Peter. David then became jealous of Peter and often badmouthed Peter in Katie’s presence. As David’s animosity towards Peter was one-sided and irrational, Katie became increasingly uncomfortable with his behaviour. Katie could also sense that David was pressuring her to end her friendship with Peter. Katie knew that she should confront David about his behaviour, but as she did not know how to approach the matter, she chose to suffer in silence.
Soon, Katie could no longer stand being pushed and pulled in the middle and reckoned that the only way to escape her predicament was to end her friendship with one of them. She then decided to cut ties with David as she could not stomach his negativity any longer. Without warning, Katie began to avoid David altogether. She rationalized that going “cold turkey” was the only way to end David’s attachment to her. Unfortunately, her rash decision and action brought about newfound hostility towards her from David. Till this day, Katie deeply regrets how things ended with David. Alas, she feels that too much time had already passed to mend things and have a proper closure with him.
As shown from this story, it is often difficult to make the best decisions in the heat of a crisis. Thus, it is my belief that fresh perspectives from outsiders are extremely helpful in dealing with our inter-personal conflicts. What would you have done, if you were Katie, to minimize hurt for all parties?